The appeal challenges FERC’s acceptance of PJM’s tariff revisions, establishing a fast-track process for certain generation projects to address resource adequacy concerns.
The complaint alleges that indicated energy efficiency sellers lack evidence to support payments for the 2025/2026 capacity market delivery year.
Distribution, transmission, and state policies identified as major contributors, challenging assumptions about PJM’s recent record capacity auction.
RMI champions co-locating data centers with gas generators and renewables to boost grid reliability and cut emissions.
The petition challenges FERC’s decision to apply a revised ROE methodology retroactively, impacting refunds and potentially setting a precedent for future rate cases.
The ruling marks a decisive blow to the oil major’s dispute over its supply contract with Venture Global LNG.
Cities appeal FERC’s decision on the $2 billion transmission project, arguing unfair cost allocation.
The ruling reinforces FERC’s limited role in disputes that it considers contractual rather than regulatory, even when those disputes involve state-level environmental compliance programs like RGGI.
The coalition warns that inaction could lead to consumer costs more than doubling to a staggering $37 billion in the 2026/2027 auction.
Project proponents say the pipeline is necessary to handle the expected surge in natural gas demand during the upcoming heating season.
The petition comes after FERC’s most recent review of Dynegy’s market activity is said to turn up evidence of misconduct.
The exclusion of RMR capacity in the 2026/2027 auction could cost consumers as much as $14.5B, OPSI says.
The coalition warns that inaction could lead to consumer costs more than doubling to a staggering $37 billion in the 2026/2027 auction.
